← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/4642/2019dismissed

Saket Kumar Sahu v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-12-16Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (C) No. 4642 of 2019 Saket Kumar Sahu S/o Shri Tularam Sahu, Aged About 41 Years, R/o School Para, Ward No. 12, Gunderdehi, District Balod, Chhattisgarh, ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Urban Administration And Development Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, New Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Chief Election Officer, Office Of CG State Election Commissioner, Near DKS Bhavan, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. District Election Officer/ Collector, District Balod, Chhattisgarh

4. Returning Officer (Sub Divisional Officer), Nagar Panchayat, Gunderdehi, District Balod, Chhattisgarh

5. Chief Municipal Council Officer, Nagar Panchayat, Gunderdehi, District Balod, Chhattisgarh

6. Ashok Mahobia, S/o Late Narayan Mahobia, R/o Ward No. 12, Dhamtari Chowk, Gunderdehi, District Balod, Chhattisgarh

7. Gaukaran Sonkar S/o Late Ganesh Sonkar, R/o Ward No. 12, Kadra Para, Gunderdehi, District Balod, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Goutam Khetrapal with Mr. Raj Kumar Pali, Advocates For State :

Mr. Jitendra Pali, Dy. A.G.

For Respondent no.2 :

Mr. Shivraj Singh, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order On Board

16.12.2019

1. The relief sought in the present writ petition is for quashment of the order dated 07.12.2019 (Annexure P-1) passed by the respondent no.4 cancelling the nomination of the petitioner for the post of Councilor(Parshad) in the forthcoming local body election. The further relief sought by the petitioner is for a direction to the respondents to consider the candidature of the petitioner.

2. Considering the fact that the election programme has already been notified and the nomination forms and the finalization of the candidates have all been finalized, this Court is of the opinion that the writ petition in its present form before this Court under the writ jurisdiction would not be maintainable. The remedy available to the petitioner would be that of filing of an election petition under Section 20 of the Chhattisgarh Municipality Act, 1961 against the rejection of his nomination. Any further relief sought for, as a consequence, would also be subsequent to the finding given in the election petition.

3. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as not maintainable.

4. Subject to the petitioner furnishing photo copy of the impugned order and other annexures, the certified copy of the same shall be returned to the petitioner.

Sd/- P. Sam Koshy Judge Khatai