Deepak Tiwari & ORS. v. State Of Chhattisgarh
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MCRC No. 8278 of 2019
1. Deepak Tiwari S/o Shri Bharat Tiwari Aged About 40 Years R/o Ward No. 12, Brahmanpara, Thankhamhariya, Tahsil And Police Station Thankhamhariya, District Bemetara Chhattisgarh.
2. Moien Khan @ Mohin S/o Izrail Khan Aged About 20 Years R/o Musalmanpara, Thankhamhariya, Tahsil And Police Station Thankhamhariya, District Bemetara, Chhattisgarh.
3. Kartikey Sharma S/o Ramlochan Sharma Aged About 19 Years R/o Brahmanpara, Thankhamhariya, Tahsil And Police Station Thankhamhariy, District Bemetara Chhattisgarh. ---- Applicants
Versus
• State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Station Kawardha, Kabirdham, District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondent For Applicants.
:
Mr. Vaibhav A. Goverdhan, Advocate.
For Respondent/State :
Mr. Vinod Kumar Tekam, PL Hon'ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey Order on Board 06.02.2020
1. The accused/applicants have moved this first bail application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for releasing them on regular bail during trial in connection with Crime No. 520/2019 registered at Police Station - Kawardha/kabirdham, District Kabirdham (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Section 20 (B) of NDPS Act.
2. It is the case of the prosecution that, on the basis of secret information, police personnel searched and seized total 5.100 KG contraband cannabis (Ganja) from the possession of applicants. Thereafter, offence has been registered against
the applicants and the applicants have been arrested.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicants have been falsely implicated in the crime in question. He further submits that as the applicants are in custody since 30.11.2019 and the trial is likely to take some time for its final disposal, they may be released on bail.
4. On the other hand, counsel for the State opposes the bail application.
5. I have heard learned Counsel for the parties.
6. Taking into consideration the nature and gravity of the offence, facts and circumstances of the case, detention period of the applicants, as trial is likely to take some time, without further commenting on merits of the case, I am inclined to release them on bail.
7. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed.
8. It is directed that the applicants shall be released on bail on executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs. 50,000/- each, with one local surety for the like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court for their appearance before the said Court as and when directed.
Sd/- (Rajani Dubey) Judge Vijay Sahu