Dhirendra Kumar Sahu v. The State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WP(S) No.292 of 2020

1. Dhirendra Kumar Sahu S/o Mr. Ramadhin Sahu Aged About 52 Years By Occupation Lecturer (Local Body), Posted At Govt. Higher Secondary School, Paoni, Block Bilaigarh District Balodabazar Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh

2. Milketan Lal Patel S/o Mr. Ramnarayan Patel Aged About 55 Years By Occupation Lecturer (Local Body), Posted At Govt. Higher Secondary School, Belondi, Paoni, Block Bilaigarh District Balodabazar Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh

3. Harendra Kumar Shandilya S/o Mr. Romnath Shandilya Aged About 47 Years By Occupation Lecturer (Local Body), Posted At Govt. Higher Secondary School Khursula, Block Bilaigarh District Balodabazar Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh

4. Purushottam Prasad Jaisawal S/o Mr. Jagannath Prasad Jaisawal Aged About 48 Years By Occupation Lecturer (Local Body), Posted At Govt. Higher Secondary School, Bilaigarh, Block Bilaigarh District Balodabazar Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. The State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, School Education Department, Mahanadi Bhawan Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Secretary Panchayat And Rural Development Department Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. District Education Officer District Balodabazar Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh

4. Chief Executive Officer Jila Panchayat District Balodabazar Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh

5. Nagar Panchayat Through Chief Municipal Officer, Bilaigarh, District Balodabazar Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Parag Kotecha, Advocate For Respondent/ State :

Mr. Alok Bakshi, Additional A.G.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order On Board 15.01.2020

1.

Challenge in this petition is that though the petitioners were initially appointed as Shiksha Karmi Grade-III and have subsequently been absorbed to the Education Department, they have by now completed 10 years of service and therefore they are entitled for the benefit of Karmonnati as per rules governing the field, however, the respondents till date have not granted the said benefit to the petitioners.

2.

Given the limited grievance which the petitioners have raised, let the petitioners make a suitable representation to the respondents No.3 & 4 within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order and the respondents No.3 & 4, in turn, shall take a decision on the granting of Kramonnati to the petitioners within a further period of 90 days. 3.

The writ petition accordingly stands disposed of. Sd/- (Goutam Bhaduri) Judge yasmin