Naresh Kumar v. Sumitra

$~22 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ MAT.APP.(F.C.) 44/2023 and CM APPLs. 7460/2023, 7462/2023 NARESH KUMAR .....Appellant Through:

Mr Abhimanyu Lall, Advocate.

versus SUMITRA .....Respondent Through:

None.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL

O R D E R

% 20.09.2024 [Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)] 1.

The record shows that the respondent has been served, however, there is no representation on behalf of the respondent. 2.

Mr Abhimanyu Lall, learned counsel, who appears on behalf of the appellant, says that the parties have arrived at an oral settlement and, therefore, he has instructions to withdraw the present appeal. 3.

Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. 4.

Pending applications shall also stand closed. 5.

Registry will dispatch a copy of the order passed today to the respondent at the address provided in the memo of parties. RAJIV SHAKDHER, J AMIT BANSAL, J SEPTEMBER 20, 2024/ kd Click here to check corrigendum, if any The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/10/2024 at 12:27:34