Roshan Lal & ORS v. State (Govt Of NCT Of Delhi) & ANR

$~5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 32/2019 & CRL.M.A.119/2019 ROSHAN LAL & ORS .... Petitioners Through:

Mr. Amit Verma, Adv. with petitioners in person versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR ... Respondents Through:

Mr. Kamal Kumar Ghei, APP with W/SI Prabha, PS Prasad Nagar, Delhi Mr. Rahul, Adv. for R-2 with R-2 in person

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR

O R D E R

% 21.01.2019 CRL.M.A. 119/2019 (for exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of.

CRL.M.C. 32/2019 1.

The petitioners have filed the present petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for quashing of FIR No.351/2014 under Sections 498-A/406/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 ('IPC'), registered at Police Station Prasad Nagar, New Delhi and the proceedings emanating therefrom.

2.

The petitioners and respondent No.2 as well as the learned counsel for the parties submitted that the parties have entered into a settlement agreement dated 31.5.2016 before the Counselling Cell,

presided over by learned Principal Judge, Family Court, West District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi in pursuance whereof, the marriage between petitioner No.1 and the respondent No.2 stands dissolved vide a decree of divorce dated 27.9.2018.

3.

The Investigating Officer ('IO'), who is present in Court, has identified the petitioners as well as respondent No.2 and has also verified the settlement arrived at between the parties. 4.

The petitioners and the respondent No.2, present in the Court, stated that the settlement was arrived at between the parties on their own free will, without any force, pressure or coercion, in terms whereof the petitioners have to pay the balance amount of Rs.2,00,000/- to the respondent No.2. Respondent No.2 submitted that in case the petitioners make the payment of Rs.2,00,000/- in terms of the settlement arrived at between the parties, she has no objection to the quashing of the FIR and the petition being allowed. 5.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners have brought a Demand Draft bearing No.960669 dated 10.01.2019 for an amount of Rs.2,00,000/- which has been handed over to the respondent No.2 in Court. The petitioners have also handed over the documents to respondent No.2. The parties submitted that in view of the payment of the balance amount as well as in the interest of justice, the aforesaid petition may be allowed. 6.

In view of the aforesaid circumstances and the settlement arrived at between the parties, this Court is of the view that no fruitful purpose would be served in keeping the parties entangled in the

criminal proceedings. Accordingly, in the interest of justice, FIR No.351/2014 under Sections 498-A/406/34 of the IPC, registered at Police Station Prasad Nagar, New Delhi and all the consequential proceedings arising out of the FIR are quashed. 7.

Petition is disposed of in above terms.

CHANDER SHEKHAR, J JANUARY 21, 2019/rk