High Court of DelhiW.P.(C)/30/2017

Tulsi Devi & ORS v. Edmc Through Its Commissioner & ORS

2017-01-06Hon'Ble Ms. Justice Indermeet Kaur2 pages

$~26 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 30/2017 & C.M. Nos.187-189/2017 TULSI DEVI & ORS ..... Petitioners Through Mr. N.K. Verma and Mr. Mohit Singh, Advs.

versus EDMC THROUGH ITS COMMISSIONER & ORS ..... Respondents Through Mr. Jagdish Sagar, Adv for R-1.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR

O R D E R

% 06.01.2017 The order impugned before this Court is the order passed by the ATMCD dated 22.12.2016. The petitioner is aggrieved. His submission is that without hearing him, an order of sealing qua his property has been passed.

On advance notice, learned counsel for the respondents has put in appearance. His submission is that this is an appealable order under Section 347-B of the DMC Act.

This petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. Liberty is granted to the petitioner to approach the appropriate forum. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has also received a vacation notice issued by the Department dated 30.12.2016 under Section 349 of the DMC Act. He seeks liberty to approach the appropriate forum. This liberty is also granted to the

petitioner.

With these directions, petition disposed of.

Order dasti.

INDERMEET KAUR, J JANUARY 06, 2017