Dharamveer v. State

$~10 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ BAIL APPLN. 3164/2019 DHARAMVEER ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Sushil Kr. Jain, Advs.

versus STATE ..... Respondent Through Mr.Amit Chadha, APP with SI Manisha Meena

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT

O R D E R

% 27.01.2020 Learned counsel for petitioner has not disputed the fact that coaccused is on bail, who actually committed alleged rape and has married with prosecutrix and staying with her as husband and wife. The alleged role of petitioner is that when prosecutrix was raped, petitioner was driving car in which the prosecutrix was raped by co-accused (now husband). In view of the above, on parity and without commenting on merits of the case, I am of the view that the petitioner is entitled for bail. Accordingly, he shall be released on bail on his furnishing personal bond in the sum of ₹20,000/- with one surety of the like amount to satisfaction of the Trial Court.

Present petition is allowed and disposed of.

Order dasti under signatures of the Court Master. SURESH KUMAR KAIT, J JANUARY 27, 2020/rk