V Sundar Raj v. Union Of India And ANR

$~41 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision: 09.01.2023 + W.P.(C) 211/2023 V SUNDAR RAJ ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr.Abhay Kumar Bhargava & Mr.Satyaarth B. Sinha, Advs.

versus UNION OF INDIA AND ANR ..... Respondents Through:

Mr.Amit Gupta, SPC with Mr.Waize Ali Noor, Adv. & Sh.Paramveer Singh, AC (LAW) BSF.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA J U D G M E N T (oral) 1.

Present petition has been filed seeking directions to the respondents DG BSF to give the petitioner benefits of terminal posting to a place near his hometown.

2.

For the aforesaid relief, petitioner has already made representation dated 26.06.2022 before Director General, Border Security Force for his transfer in terms of the terminal posting rules stipulated under Rule 10 of the BSF (Tenue of Posting and Deputation) Rules, 2000. 3.

Accordingly, respondents are directed to decide the same within three weeks from today and the decision taken thereon shall be communicated to W.P.(C) 211/2023 By:ALKA BOBAL 17:22

the petitioner in writing within one week thereafter. 4.

Needless to say that if the petitioner is still aggrieved by the decision of the respondents, he may challenge the same before the appropriate forum. 5.

In view of aforesaid directions, petition is disposed of. (SURESH KUMAR KAIT) JUDGE (NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA) JUDGE JANUARY 09, 2023/ab W.P.(C) 211/2023 By:ALKA BOBAL 17:22