Urmila v. The State (NCT Of Delhi)

$~26 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(CRL) 268/2016 URMILA ..... Petitioner Through :

Mr.Kunal Arora, Advocate.

versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through :

Mr.Ashish Negi, Proxy counsel.

SI Ramesh Kumar.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG

O R D E R

% 18.03.2016 1.

The instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed on behalf of the petitioner for seeking parole for a period of three months. Status report is on record. Address of the petitioner has been verified. 2.

Nominal Roll dated 10.03.2016 reveals that the petitioner was convicted under Section 366A/109 IPC read with Section 376(2)(g) IPC and sentenced to undergo RI for eight years with fine ` 10,000/-. Crl.A.116/2012 was disposed of by this Court on 19.08.2015. Nominal Roll further reveals that the petitioner has already undergone four years, ten months and thirteen days incarceration besides remission for one year, two months and twenty days as on 09.03.2016. It further reveals that she is not involved in any other W.P.(CRL) 268/2016

criminal case and is not a previous convict. Her overall jail conduct is satisfactory. She has not availed any interim bail or parole during her detention.

3.

In the interest of justice and for the reasons mentioned in the writ petition, the petitioner is granted three weeks parole from the date of release, on furnishing personal bond in the sum of `25,000/- with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court/CMM/Duty Magistrate. After completion of parole period, the petitioner shall surrender before the Jail Superintendent. 4.

Writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms. S.P.GARG, J MARCH 18, 2016 / tr W.P.(CRL) 268/2016