Nitika Bhatnagar v. University Of Delhi

$~13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 107/2016 NITIKA BHATNAGAR ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. Ashok Kumar, Adv.

versus UNIVERSITY OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through:

Ms. Manu Padalia, Adv. for Mr.

Ankur Chhibber, Advocate.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J. MEHTA

O R D E R

% 23.11.2016 1.

This writ petition is disposed of with the consent order that the present writ petition will be treated as a representation to the respondent against the order terminating services on the ground of alleged non satisfactory services of the petitioner.

Petitioner will be given hearing by the competent authority and petitioner will be entitled to file any documents which she desires to show that the services were satisfactory. The competent authority will, after hearing the petitioner, pass a speaking order to be communicated to the petitioner.

In case, the petitioner is still dissatisfied at that stage, the petitioner in accordance with law will always have a right to file appropriate independent proceedings.

The process of hearing the petitioner and passing

of a speaking order be completed by the respondent within a period of six weeks from today.

2.

The writ petition is disposed of in terms of the aforesaid observations. VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J NOVEMBER 23, 2016 ib