← Library
High Court of DelhiW.P.(C)/13198/2019

Shree Jee Roadlines & ORS v. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd & ORS

2019-12-19Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Navin Chawla2 pages

$~34 & 35 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 13198/2019 SHREE JEE ROADLINES & ORS ..... Petitioners Through Mr.Avneesh Arputham, Ms.Anuradha Arputham and Ms.Geetanjali, Advs.

versus INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD & ORS ..... Respondents Through Mr.Vikram Mehta, Ms.Debolina Roy and Ms.Mansa Shukla, Advs. for R-1.

Mr.Rajesh Gogna,CGSC and Ms.Rahella Khan, Advs. for R-3.

Mr.Ramesh Singh, SC, Ms.Hetu Arora Sethi, ASC, Mr.Abhimanyu Verma and Mr.Siddarth Agarwal, Advs. for R-4.

(35) W.P.(C) 560/2020 M/S SHREE JEE ROADLINES AND ORS.

..... Petitioners Through Mr.Avneesh Arputham, Ms.Anuradha Arputham and Ms.Geetanjali, Advs.

versus BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD. AND ORS.

..... Respondents Through Mr.Ramesh Singh, SC, Ms.Hetu Arora Sethi, ASC, Mr.Abhimanyu Verma and Mr.Siddarth Agarwal, Advs. for R-3.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA

O R D E R

% 17.02.2020 CM No.6200/2020 in WP(C) 13198/2019 CM No.6199/2020 in WP(C) 560/2020 These applications have been filed seeking modification of the orders dated 19.12.2019 and 21.01.2020 in WP(C) 13198/2019 and order dated 15.01.2020 in WP(C) 560/2020 passed by this Court. The applications are premised on the Office Memorandum dated 10.01.2020 issued by the Ministry of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises, Government of India. In my opinion, the aforestated orders do not require any modification based on the Office Memorandum, however, it is made clear that the orders passed by this Court shall not act as a precedent. The time for compliance of the above orders is extended by a further eight weeks on the same terms and conditions as specified in the previous orders.

Interim order to continue.

Dasti under the signature of the Court Master. NAVIN CHAWLA, J FEBRUARY 17, 2020/Arya