Birmati v. State & ORS.

$~9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P. (CRL.) 3364/2019 BIRMATI ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. Joginder Tuli, Advocate.

Versus

STATE & ORS.

..... Respondents Through:

Mr. Avi Singh, ASC for State with Mr. Tanuj Bhadana, Advocate.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI (VIA VIDEO CONFERENCING)

O R D E R

% 31.07.2020 CRL. M.A. 10264/2020 1.

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions 2.

Application is disposed of.

CRL. M.A. 10263/2020 (Early Hearing) 1.

For the reasons explained in the application, the writ petition is preponed for today. Date already fixed in the writ petition stands cancelled. 2.

Application is disposed of.

W.P. (CRL.) 3364/2019 1.

By way of present writ petition, the petitioner had sought directions to be given to respondent no.2-Commissioner of Police for conducting a vigilance inquiry against respondent nos. 3 to 5 in FIR No. 300/2019 under Sections 186/353/307/34 and Sections 25/27 of the Arms Act registered at P.S. North Rohini.

2.

Mr. Avi Singh, learned ASC for the State, on instructions, submits W.P. (CRL.) 3364/2019 Page 1 of 2

that a vigilance inquiry has already been concluded by the Delhi Police and a copy whereof shall be supplied to Mr. Joginder Tuli, learned counsel for the petitioner within two weeks.

3.

In view of the above, nothing survives in the present petition, the same is disposed of as infructuous. The miscellaneous application is also disposed of as infructuous.

MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J JULY 31, 2020 ga W.P. (CRL.) 3364/2019 Page 2 of 2