Shahrukh v. State NCT Of Delhi
$~44 *
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ BAIL APPLN. 149/2026 SHAHRUKH .....Petitioner Through:
Mr. Javed Alvi, Advocate (Through VC) versus STATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through:
Mr. Aashneet Singh, APP Insp. Narender, PS Nangloi and Insp.
V.N. Jha, District Rohini
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN
O R D E R
% 15.01.2026 CRL.M.A. 1261/2026 (for exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. BAIL APPLN. 149/2026 1.
Present application has been filed by applicant Shahrukh under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for grant of regular bail in case FIR No. 689/2019 PS Nangloi under Section 302/34 IPC. 2.
Applicant is facing trial for murder case and is in custody since the date of his arrest i.e. 28.10.2019.
3.
As per allegations appearing in the charge-sheet, accused Farman and Shahrukh (present applicant herein) had earlier fight and arguments with complainant Mohd. Imran and on the date of incident, there was another fight and the aforesaid two accused i.e. Farman and Shahrukh were joined by Dilshad and Sajid. Accused Farman is stated to be principal offender as he BAIL APPLN. 149/2026 1 The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
was the one who was carrying knife and gave repeated stabs with the knife to Mohd. Imran which resulted in his death.
4.
Other accused, including applicant Shahrukh were responsible for giving beatings, kicks and punches.
5.
Mr. Javed Alvi, learned counsel for applicant submits that applicant has no previous involvement and is in incarceration for last more than six years. He also submits that applicant is a young offender and there is no question of his influencing the case as complainant/eyewitness has already entered into witness box. He also submits that other two accused i.e. Dilshad and Sajid whose roles are, more or less, similar have already been enlarged on bail. 6.
Learned Addl. P.P. for State does not dispute the fact that applicant is behind the bars from the date of his arrest and complainant has already been examined.
7.
I have also seen nominal roll of applicant. Same is taken on record. As per such nominal roll, applicant is having no other involvement. 8.
Keeping in mind the overall facts and circumstances of the case and the period of incarceration and previous clean antecedents of the applicant, applicant Shahrukh is admitted to bail on his furnishing personal bond and surety bond in a sum of Rs. 35,000/- each subject to the satisfaction of concerned learned Trial Court/Chief Judicial Magistrate/Duty Judicial Magistrate First Class.
9.
Conditions as imposed upon accused Dilshad by this Court in terms of order dated 09.07.2025 passed in Bail Application No. 305/2025 would also be applicable to the present applicant.
10.
Application stands disposed of in aforesaid terms. BAIL APPLN. 149/2026 2 The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
11.
A copy of this order be sent to learned Trial Court and Superintendent Jail for information and compliance.
MANOJ JAIN, J JANUARY 15, 2026/dr/sy BAIL APPLN. 149/2026 3 The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.