← Library
High Court of DelhiBAIL APPLN./19/2018

Satish Bhaskar v. State Of NCT Of Delhi

2018-01-04Hon'Ble Mr. Justice A.K. Pathak3 pages

$~23 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ BAIL APPLN. 19/2018 SATISH BHASKAR ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Santosh Singh Bagga, Adv.

Versus

STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through Mr. M.S. Oberoi, APP with SI Md.

Imteayaz Alam, P.S. Shahbad Dairy

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK

O R D E R

% 04.01.2018 Crl. M.A. no.119/2018 (exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. BAIL APPLN. 19/2018 FIR No. 222/2017 under Sections 442/448/451/452/506/34 IPC was registered at Police Station Shahbad Dairy, pursuant to the directions of learned Metropolitan Magistrate passed under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. Complainant alleged in the FIR that she had purchased the property nos. 212-213, Sector 25, Pocket 5, Rohini, New Delhi vide registered transfer

documents dated 3rd October, 2008 from Shri Pawan Kumar Aggarwal. In the month of November, 2015 when she visited the property, she found that locks were broken and changed. Neighbours informed that petitioner and his co-accused had trespassed the property on 23rd November, 2015. She lodged DD No. 49B at police station on 23rd November, 2015. When she returned from the police station, petitioner and his co-accused were found standing outside the said property. They were armed with knife, stick and iron rods. Petitioner and co-accused had trespassed the property. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is son of the co-accused Amar Nath Bhaskar, who had taken the property on rent from the complainant in the year 2013. Thereafter, co-accused started living in the said property.

Petitioner's father Amar Nath Bhaskar even got a gas connection at the aforesaid property right from 2013. Petitioner is living with his father in the said property right since 2013. Co-accused Amar Nath Bhaskar has already been granted bail.

Keeping in mind the totality of facts and circumstances of the case, it is ordered that in case of arrest, petitioner be released on anticipatory bail subject to his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of `10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of

the Investigating Officer/Arresting Officer/SHO concerned. Bail application is disposed of in the above terms. Dasti.

A.K. PATHAK, J.

JANUARY 04, 2018 r.bararia