Manoj v. State NCT Of Delhi

$~80 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(CRL) 139/2026 MANOJ .....Petitioner Through:

Mr. Shanu Baghel and Mr. Shubham Prajapati, Advocates.

versus STATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through:

Mr. Rahul Tyagi, ASC for the State alongwith Ms. Priya Rai, Mr. Sangeet Sibou, Mr.

Shubham Goyal, Ms.

Anshu Chothwani and Mr. Harsh Kumar, Advocates.

SI Sandeep Yadav, P.S.: Sadar Bazar.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI

O R D E R

% 15.01.2026 CRL.M.A. 1265/2026 (exemption) Exemption granted, subject to just exceptions. Let requisite compliances be made within 01 week. The application stands disposed of.

W.P.(CRL) 139/2026 By way of the present petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, the petitioner seeks extension of parole granted by the competent authority vide order dated 22.12.2025. 2.

It is noticed that vide his Application dated 27.10.2025, the petitioner had sought parole for a period of 06 months. However, vide order W.P.(CRL) 139/2026 The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/01/2026 at 13:56:20

dated 22.12.2025, the petitioner was granted parole for a period of 02 weeks. The petitioner is stated to have been released from custody on 09.01.2026.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits, that the petitioner was granted parole on the ground that the petitioner and his wife were attempting to conceive through In-Vitro Fertilization. Learned counsel submits, that weeks is not long enough to complete treatment/process.

4.

Learned counsel also submits, that the parole granted to the petitioner expires on 23.01.2026.

5.

Since parole was granted by the concerned authority, the petitioner is directed to first send a representation/application to the said authority, seeking extension of parole. The concerned authority is directed to decide such representation/application within 03 days, in accordance with the relevant rules, under written intimation to the petitioner. 6.

The petition is disposed-of in the above terms, granting liberty to the petitioner to approach this court in the event his grievance survives thereafter.

7.

Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed-of. ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, J JANUARY 15, 2026/ak W.P.(CRL) 139/2026 The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/01/2026 at 13:56:20