Mumtaz @ Hazi Malam v. State & ANR.

$~80 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(CRL) 3516/2019 MUMTAZ @ HAZI MALAM ..... Petitioner Through None.

versus STATE & ANR.

..... Respondents Through Mr. Rajesh Mahajan, ASC with Ms.

Shnitha Vedi, Adv.

SI Rakesh Rana, Spl. Cell.

Mr. Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC for R2.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU

O R D E R

% 03.03.2020 1.

None appears for the petitioner.

2.

The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, praying that direction be issued for releasing the petitioner as she has been discharged by the learned Additional Sessions Judge by an order dated 03.12.2018 in FIR No.31/2018 registered with Police Station, Special Cell (SB). 3.

Mr. Mahajan, the learned ASC appearing for the State, submits that the order dated 03.12.2018, whereby the petitioner was discharged, was set aside by this Court by an order dated 26.02.2020 in Crl.Rev.P. No.240/2019, therefore, the petitioner is now required to be tried.

4.

In view of the above, and since the petitioner is not appearing, the petition is dismissed in default.

VIBHU BAKHRU, J MARCH 03, 2020 dr