Kanchan v. State

$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 3174/2019 KANCHAN ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. Vijay Kinger & Ms.Roopa Nagpal, Advocates

Versus

STATE ..... Respondent Through:

Mr. G.M.Farooqui, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with SI K.P.Singh P.S.: Nand Nagri

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BRIJESH SETHI

O R D E R

% 10.02.2020 Petitioner is seeking anticipatory bail in FIR No. 608/2019, registered at police station Nand Nagri, Delhi for the offences under Sections 308/323/34 IPC on the ground that he has been falsely implicated in this case.

Learned counsel for petitioner submits that in the MLC the injuries are opined to be simple in nature and that after grant of interim protection by this Court, petitioner has already joined the investigation and his custodial interrogation is not at all required and therefore, petitioner be granted protection from arrest in this case.

Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for State has vehemently opposed the bail application on the ground that only on the directions of BAIL APPLN. 3174/2019

this Court, the petitioner has joined the investigation in this case and that petitioner does not deserve concession of anticipatory bail. Heard.

Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of this case, it is directed that in the event of arrest, petitioner be admitted to bail on his furnishing bail bond in the sum of Rs.15,000/- with one local surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Investigating Officer concerned, provided petitioner joins the investigation as and when called. The application stands disposed of accordingly. Dasti.

BRIJESH SETHI, J FEBRUARY 10, 2020 r BAIL APPLN. 3174/2019