Rajesh Jindal v. Jyoti Jindal

$~7.

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ MAT.APP.(F.C.) 340/2019 RAJESH JINDAL ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Shweta, Advocate versus JYOTI JINDAL ..... Respondent Through: None

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ASHA MENON

O R D E R

% 17.02.2020 1.

The respondent remains unserved. The Registry has submitted a report to the effect that the counsel for the appellant did not take any steps to collect the summons directed to be served on the respondent through speed post and courier.

2.

Issue fresh notice to the respondent on the appellant filing the process fee in terms of the order dated 24.12.2019, returnable on 13.04.2020. 3.

Learned counsel for the appellant shall ensure that she does not commit a default in collecting the summons for effecting service on the respondent by speed post and courier this time. HIMA KOHLI, J ASHA MENON, J FEBRUARY 17, 2020 rkb