Akrar Lliyas Ahmed v. The State Of N.C.T Of Delhi

$~72 & 73 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 239/2024 AKRAR LLIYAS AHMED ..... Petitioner Through:

None.

versus THE STATE OF N.C.T OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through:

Mr. Laksh Khanna, APP for State with SI Hemant, Special Cell.

Mr. Nisheeth Dixit, Advocate for complainant.

+ BAIL APPLN. 630/2024 SANDEEP @ SONU ..... Petitioner Through:

None.

versus STATE OF GNCTD ..... Respondent Through:

Mr. Laksh Khanna, APP for State with SI Hemant, Special Cell.

Mr. Nisheeth Dixit, Advocate for complainant.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI

O R D E R

% 29.04.2024 CRL.M.A. 12727/2024 (for direction by complainant) in BAIL APPLN. 239/2024 CRL.M.A. 12806/2024 (for direction by complainant) in BAIL APPLN. 630/2024 1.

Learned counsel for the applicant/complainant states that through he had appeared on 16.04.2024, however inadvertently his presence could not be marked on that date. Learned APP confirms the said factum. 2.

For the reasons mentioned in the applications, the same are allowed The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/05/2024 at 12:15:36

and the presence of learned counsel for the applicant/complainant be read in the order dated 16.04.2024.

3.

The applications are disposed of accordingly. MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J APRIL 29, 2024/rd The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/05/2024 at 12:15:36