Savita Gupta v. Suresh Chand Gupta & ANR.

$~58 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ RFA 143/2023 SAVITA GUPTA .....Appellant Through:

Mr. Jeewesh Prakash, Mr. Saumitra Mishra, Mr. Sankalp Srivastava, Ms.

Ritu Dubey and Mr. Sandeep Agarwal, Advocates.

versus SURESH CHAND GUPTA & ANR.

.....Respondents Through:

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI

O R D E R

% 14.11.2025 CM APPL. 71493/2025 By way of the present application filed under section 16-A of the Court Fee Act, 1870 read with section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure 1908, the appellant seeks refund of the court-fee affixed on the memo of appeal.

Learned counsel appearing for the appellant submits, that the appeal already stands disposed-of as withdrawn vide order dated 10.11.2025, in terms of the Memorandum of Understanding dated 22.03.2025 ('MoU') and Corrigendum dated 29.07.2025 to the MoU, as referred-to in that order. In view of the prayer made, it is not considered necessary to issue notice on this application.

The application is accordingly allowed.

RFA 143/2023 The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/11/2025 at 12:42:04

The Registry is directed to refund to the appellant 50% of the courtfee affixed on the memo of appeal. Let requisite certificate be drawn-up in favour of the appellant within 02 weeks of the appellant approaching to the Registry for the purpose. The application is disposed-of in the above terms. RFA 143/2023 The present appeal already stood disposed-of vide order dated 10.11.2025.

ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, J NOVEMBER 14, 2025 V.Rawat RFA 143/2023 The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/11/2025 at 12:42:04