Multi Tv Tech Solution Pvt Ltd v. Intex Technologies India Limited

$~54 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + O.M.P. (T) (COMM.) 10/2025 MULTI TV TECH SOLUTION PVT LTD .....Petitioner Through:

Mrs. Sonali Karwasra Joon and Mr.

Lakshay Jain, Advocates.

versus INTEX TECHNOLOGIES INDIA LIMITED .....Respondent Through:

Ms. Sulakshana Yadav, Advocate.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD

O R D E R

% 21.01.2025 I.A. 1608/2025 (Exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

O.M.P. (T) (COMM.) 10/2025 1.

The present petition under Section 14(1)(b) read with Section 15 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking substitution of the Ld. Sole Arbitrator - Mr. Jagmohan Sabharwal, Senior Advocate, with an alternate Arbitrator.

2.

Material on record indicates that disputes had arisen between the parties under a Master Services Agreement dated 07.09.2016 and the Petitioner filed a petition being ARB.P. 816/2017 before this Court for appointment of an Arbitrator to adjudicate upon the disputes between the parties. This Court vide Order dated 05.02.2018 had appointed Mr. Jagmohan Sabharwal, Senior Advocate, as a Sole Arbitrator. 3.

It is stated that the Ld. Sole Arbitrator has expressed his inability to The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/01/2025 at 16:02:22

continue with the arbitration proceedings on account of his ill health and, therefore, the Petitioner has filed the present petition for appointment of a substitute Arbitrator.

4.

It is stated by the learned Counsel for the Petitioner that the arbitration proceedings are at the stage of final arguments. 5.

This Court is inclined to appoint Ms. Tamali Wad, Sr. Advocate (Mob No.9810025306) as a substitute Arbitrator to further adjudicate upon the disputes between the parties.

6.

It is for the substituted Arbitrator to decide whether to proceed with the final arguments after looking into the records of the case or to proceed de novo. The fees be, therefore, fixed accordingly as per the fee schedule fixed by the DIAC.

7.

The petition is disposed of, along with pending application(s), if any. SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, J JANUARY 21, 2025 S. Zakir The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/01/2025 at 16:02:22