Mr Vidyut Raj Gupta v. M/S Pathankot Timber Traders

$~25 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ RFA(COMM) 13/2024 and C.M. No. 3876/2024 MR VIDYUT RAJ GUPTA ..... Appellant Through:

Mr M.N. Siddiqui, Advocate.

versus M/S PATHANKOT TIMBER TRADERS ..... Respondent Through:

None.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL

O R D E R

% 22.04.2024 [Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)] 1.

There is no representation on behalf of the respondent. 2.

Mr M.N. Siddiqui, learned counsel, who appears on behalf of the appellant, says the reason that the respondent is not represented as parties have already settled.

2.1 Mr Siddiqui, thus, seeks to withdraw the present appeal. 3.

The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn. 4.

Interim order dated 22.01.2024 shall stand vacated. 5.

We may note that in any event the decretal amount, as directed via the said order, was not deposited.

6.

Pending application, i.e. C.M. No. 3876/2024 shall, consequently, stand closed.

RAJIV SHAKDHER, J.

AMIT BANSAL, J.

APRIL 22, 2024 kd Click here to check corrigendum, if any The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 06:25:24