Sanjay Mann v. Bhim Singh Now Deceased Trough Lrs And ORS

$~20 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RFA 210/2023, CM APPL. 12435/2023 SANJAY MANN .....Appellant Through:

Mr.

Chatanya, Advocate with Appellant in person versus BHIM SINGH NOW DECEASED TROUGH LRS AND ORS .....Respondents Through:

Mr. Sachin Updadhyay, Advocate for R-1(B) and 1(C) R-4(D) in person

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA

O R D E R

% 18.03.2026 CM APPL. 59555/2025 1.

Application filed on behalf of the Appellant seeking withdrawal of the Appeal.

2.

The Appellant is present in person, who submits that the litigation is exorbitantly expensive for him to pursue and seeks permission to withdraw the present Appeal.

3.

Reply as been filed on behalf of Respondent No. 4(D)-Ankit Mann wherein an objection is taken to withdrawal of the Appeal on the ground that the Appeal has defective affidavit and they have not been notarised property by the Oath Commissioner and that there is concealment of material facts from the Court and malpractices had been adopted by the Appellant in filing the Appeal. The withdrawal of the Appeal is therefore contested. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/03/2026 at 13:25:36

4.

There is no provision under CPC, which permits the Respondent to oppose the unconditional withdrawal of the Appeal except that they can seek the imposition of cost.

5.

In the facts and circumstances of the case, no imposition of cost is made out.

6.

The Appeal along with pending Application, is permitted to be withdrawn. Accordingly, the Appeal stands disposed of. NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J MARCH 18, 2026 N The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/03/2026 at 13:25:36