Kumar Sambhav @ Kaku v. State

$~64 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ BAIL APPLN. 21/2012 KUMAR SAMBHAV @ KAKU .....Petitioner Through:

Mr. Manish Kapoor, Advocate.

versus STATE .....Respondent Through:

Mr. Ajay Vikram Singh, APP for State.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN

O R D E R

% 06.02.2026 1.

This bail application has been placed before the Court on an Office Note.

2.

By an order dated 19.03.2012, the appeal was adjourned with the following order:- "1.

The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks time to file the statements of all the witnesses recorded till date. 2.

Let the statements of all the witnesses be filed and the matter be listed thereafter."

3.

It has not been listed thereafter.

4.

Mr. Manish Kapoor, learned counsel for the applicant, and Mr. Ajay Vikram Singh, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, submit that the application has been rendered infructuous, as the applicant was acquitted by the Sessions Court in Sessions Case No. 40/2013. The appeal filed by the State [CRL.A. 1132/2015] was also dismissed by the Division Bench BAIL APPLN. 21/2012 The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/02/2026 at 11:53:39

of this Court vide judgment dated 17.04.2018, a copy whereof has been placed on record.

5.

The bail application has, therefore, been rendered infructuous and is disposed of accordingly.

PRATEEK JALAN, J FEBRUARY 6, 2026 'pv/JM'/ BAIL APPLN. 21/2012 The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/02/2026 at 11:53:39