Purushottam Singh & ORS v. Union Of India & ANR

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 11216/2019 PURUSHOTTAM SINGH & ORS. ..... Petitioners Through:

Ms Asha Jain Madan and Mr Mukesh Jain, Advocates.

versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR ..... Respondents Through:

Mr Mohit Kapoor, Advocate for UOI with Mr A. Singh, Advocates.

Mr Siddharth Khatana, Advocate for R-2.

CORAM:

JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH

O R D E R

% 21.10.2019 CM 46175/2019 (exemption) 1.Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

W.P.(C) 11216/2019

2. The prayers in the present petition stand completely covered by the order of this Court dated 1st May, 2019 in W.P.(C) 3549/2018 (Sunil Kumar Tyagi v. Union of India) and the order dated 13th September, 2019, as modified by order dated 18th September, 2019, in W.P.(C) 8203/2019 (Ex/Hc. Prahalad v. Union of India and batch)

3. Accordingly, the petition is allowed with the following directions: (i) The Petitioners would be given the benefit of the MACP with effect from

October, 2007 instead of 1st' September, 2008. (ii) The above benefit will be given by placing the Petitioner in the pay scale of Sub Inspector i.e. 5500-9000 (pre-revised). (iii) The appropriate orders will be issued and the arrears will be paid to the Petitioners within a period of 12 weeks from today, failing which the Respondents will be liable to pay simple interest @6% per annum on the arrears for the period of delay.

4. The petition is disposed of in the above terms. S. MURALIDHAR, J.

TALWANT SINGH, J.

OCTOBER 21, 2019 rd