Chiamaka Promise Udenna @ Angel v. Narcotic Control Bureau

$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 266/2025 CHIAMAKA PROMISE UDENNA @ ANGEL .....Petitioner Through:

Mr.

Shyam Sundar Aggarrwal, Advocate(through videoconferencing) versus NARCOTIC CONTROL BUREAU .....Respondent Through:

Ms. Shelly Dixit, Advocate.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA

O R D E R

% 24.07.2025 1.

Initially, the learned counsel for accused/applicant requested for adjournment on the ground that he has been recently engaged and wants to file some additional documents to establish that the accused/applicant was illegally detained by the respondent. But on being pointed out that this application is pending for about six months and further adjournment would not be appropriate, learned counsel for accused/applicant submits that in the interest of his client, he may be permitted to withdraw this application with liberty to file fresh application, disclosing further facts and documents. 2.

The application is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as sought. GIRISH KATHPALIA, J JULY 24, 2025/DR The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/07/2025 at 11:54:24