Puschpender v. State

$~27 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(CRL) 46/2018 PUSCHPENDER ..... Petitioner Through :

Ms.Pallavi S.Kansal, Advocate with Mr.Saurabh Kansal & Mr.Sudhanshu Tiwari, Advocates. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through :

Mr.Jamal Akhtar, proxy counsel for Mr.Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel with SI Karamvir, PS Narela.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG

O R D E R

% 08.01.2018 1.

During the course of arguments, it was urged by the learned counsel for the petitioner that his application for parole has yet not been disposed of.

2.

Learned proxy counsel for the State informs that the application of the petitioner shall be disposed of within two weeks. 3.

In view of this, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the present writ petition.

The writ petition is disposed of with the direction that the application filed by the petitioner for seeking parole shall be disposed of within two weeks.

S.P.GARG, J.

JANUARY 08, 2018 / tr