Hari Lal Saini v. The Delhi Development Authority And ORS.

$-36-40

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(C) 326/2019 RAJ KUMAR p Petitioner Through:

None, versus THE DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS....respondents Through. Ms.Shobhana Takiar, Advocate for c R-1.

+ W.P.(C) 1104/2019 BHAGWATI DEVI @ BHAGATI DEVI Petitioner Through:

None.

versus THE DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ORS.

Respondents Through:

Mr.Ajay Birbal, Advocate for R-1.

+ W.P.(C) 1105/2019 BISHAN LAL Petitioner Through:

None, r versus THE DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ORS.

Respondents Through:

Mr.Ajay Birbal, Advocate for R-1.

\A W.P.(C) 2988/2019 PRABHATI LAL (SINCE DECEASED) (THROUGH HIS LEGAL HEIR) Petitioner Through:

None.

Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file and no page is missing.

W.P[C) 326/2019 & connected matters

w versus THE DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ORS.

Respondents Through:

Ms.Kajri Gupta, Advocate for R-1.

W.P.(C) 3098/2019 + HARILAL SAINI Petitioner Through:

None.

(^'

versus THE DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ORS.

Respondents Through:

Ms.Kajri Gupta, Advocate for R-1.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA

ORDER

% 02.03.2020 It is pointed out by learned counsel for the respondent that in the connected petitions of similarly situated persons, time was granted to them to vacate the subject premises on or before 31.12.2019. Learned counsel further submits that thereafter they had sought extension of time which was declined by this Court. None appears for the petitioner.

The petitions are dismissed for non prosecution. u-J / SA^JEJeV SACHDEVA, J MARCH 02, 2020 ^ rk W.PfC) 326/2019 & connected matters