M/S. Tata Steel Ltd. v. Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner & ANR.
I $~15& 16 *
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
(i)+ W.P.(CI 177/2016& C.M. 744/2016& 745/2016 M/S PRESIDENCY KID LEATHER PVT. LIMITED .. Petitioner Through:
Mr. S.K. Gupta,Advocate versus REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER ....
Respondent Through:
Ms. InderjeetSidhu& Mr. Madhur Sachdeva, Advocates (ii)+ W.P.(CI 180/2016& C.M. 747/2016 748/2016 M/S. TATA STEEL LTD.
Petitioner Through:
Mr. S.K. Gupta, Advocate versus ASSISTANT PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER & ANR.
Respondents"
Through:
Ms. InderjeetSidhu& Mr. Madhur Sachdeva, Advocates
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR
ORDER
% 08.01.2016 The relief claimed in the above captioned two petitions is on similargrounds,therefore,withthe consentoflearnedcounselfor parties, abovecaptionedtwo petitionswere heardtogetherand are beingdisposed of by this common order.
- W.P.CQ177/2016 W.P.(C) 180/2016 By:AMULYA