← Library
High Court of DelhiW.P.(CRL)/3416/2019

Jagannath D. Parkhi v. Home Secretary & ORS.

2019-12-06Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Vibhu Bakhru2 pages

$~23 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(CRL) 3416/2019 and CRL.M.A. 42097/2019 & 42098/2019 JAGANNATH D. PARKHI ..... Petitioner Through:

Petitioner in person.

versus HOME SECRETARY & ORS.

..... Respondents Through:

Mr Sanjeev Sabharwal, Senior Govt.

Counsel for UOI with Ms Bushra Waseem, Advocate.

Ms Manpreet Kaur Bhain, G.P. for UOI.

Mr Anupam S. Sharrma, SPP for CBI with Mr Rishabh Sharma, Mr Parikshith Sharma and Mr Prakash Airan, Advocates for R-2.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU

O R D E R

% 06.12.2019 1.

The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, praying that FIR bearing no. R.C.(S)/98 SCB-II/C.B.I./Delhi dated 28.08.1998 under Sections 420/468/471 of the IPC registered by CBI against the petitioner and all proceedings emanating therefrom, be quashed. 2.

It is seen that the petitioner had also filed similar petitions in the past. 3.

The learned counsel appearing for CBI has drawn the attention of this Court to an order dated 12.05.1999 passed by this Court in Crl. W.P. No. 450/1999, wherein this Court had rejected the petition seeking quashing of

the FIR in question as being unmerited. The petitioner had once again filed a writ petition being Crl. W. 859/2002 seeking a similar prayer. The said petition was also dismissed by the Division Bench of this Court on 20.01.2003 noting that the petitioner had filed an earlier writ petition seeking similar relief.

4.

The petitioner had filed another petition, Crl. M.C. No. 1524/2006 seeking quashing of the proceedings. However, on 05.12.2007, the said petition was dismissed as withdrawn. This Court is informed that two charge sheets have been framed and evidence is being recorded in respect of the alleged offences.

5.

In view of the above, this Court does not consider it apposite to entertain the present petition. The petition is, accordingly, dismissed. 6.

All the pending applications are also disposed of. 7.

It is clarified that all rights and contentions of the petitioner are reserved.

VIBHU BAKHRU, J DECEMBER 06, 2019 RK