Karan & ANR. v. State Of NCT Of Delhi & ORS.
$~81 *
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ KARAN & ANR.
.....Petitioners Through:
Mr. Avinash Das, Advocate with Mr.
Nikhil Yadav, Advocate and Ms.
Shatakshi Rai, Advocate.
Petitioners in court.
versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS.
.....Respondents Through:
Ms. Richa Dhawan, APP for the State.
S.I. Gurtej Singh, P.S: J.P. Kalan.
Respondents Nos. 2 and 3 in court.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI
O R D E R
% 29.01.2026 CRL.M.A. 2373/2026 Exemption granted, subject to just exceptions. Let requisite compliances be made within 01 week. The application stands disposed-of.
By way of the present petition filed under section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, the petitioners seek quashing of case FIR No. 0002/2026 dated 02.01.2026 registered under sections 333/115(2)/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 ('BNS') at P.S.: Jaffarpur Kalan, Dwarka, Delhi.
2.
The petition is premised on Affidavits dated 20.01.2026, whereby respondents Nos. 2 and 3 confirm that they have resolved the matter amicably with the petitioners.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
3.
The petition is also supported by affidavits of the petitioners. 4.
The contesting parties are present in court. Their credentials have been verified and they have also been identified by their respective counsel. 5.
The court has interacted with respondents Nos. 2 and 3, as also with the petitioners, who have confirmed that they have now resolved the matter amicably. Parties now wish to live in peace and harmony going forward.
6.
Ms. Richa Dhawan, learned APP confirms that the State has no objection to the subject FIR being quashed.
7.
In the circumstances, in line with the law laid down by the Supreme Court in Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab & Anr. reported as (2012) 10 SCC 303 as also in Narinder Singh & Ors. vs. State of Punjab & Anr. reported as (2014) 6 SCC 466, this court sees no reason why the subject FIR and all proceedings emanating therefrom should not be quashed. This court is of the view that in light of the settlement between the contesting parties, continuing with the subject FIR and all subsequent proceedings would be an exercise in futility and would not be conducive to peace and harmony between the parties. 8.
While allowing the petition however, this court considers it appropriate, that by way of atonement, each of the petitioners shall pay costs of Rs.10,000/- to Friendicoes SECA, No.271 & 273, Defence Colony Flyover Market, Jungpura, New Delhi within 04 weeks. 9.
Subject to the aforesaid condition, FIR No.
0002/2026 dated 02.01.2026 registered under sections 333/115(2)/3(5) BNS at P.S.: Jaffarpur Kalan, Dwarka, Delhi is quashed. All proceedings arising therefrom also stand closed.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.
10. Petitioners are directed to place on record proof of payment of costs.
11. The Registry is directed to re-list the matter if costs are not paid as directed.
12. The petition stands disposed-of.
13. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed-of. ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, J JANUARY 29, 2026 ds The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.