Asha Sharma v. Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. And ORS.

$~62 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 10365/2019 & CM APPLs. 42768/2019 & 42770/2019 ASHA SHARMA ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr.Raj Kamal, Mr. Aseem Atwal and Mr. Kartavya Batra, Advocates versus KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LTD. AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through:

None.

CORAM:

JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH

O R D E R

% 23.09.2019 CM 42769/2019 and 42770/2019 (exemption) 1.Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

W.P.(C) 10365/2019

2. The Petitioner has challenged the interim order passed by the Debt Recovery Tribunal-I (DRT) declining interim relief to the Petitioner. Against the said order of the DRT, the remedy available to the Petitioner is an appeal to the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT) under Section 18 of the SARFAESI Act.

3. The Court sees no reason to interfere at this stage. It will be open to the Petitioner to seek appropriate remedies in accordance with law.

4. The petition is dismissed along with the pending applications.

5. Order dasti under the signatures of the Court Master. S. MURALIDHAR, J.

TALWANT SINGH, J.

SEPTEMBER 23, 2019/rr