← Library
High Court of DelhiCRL.M.C./477/2025

Hardeep Singh & ORS. v. State(NCT Of Delhi) & ANR.

2025-07-03Hon'Ble Dr. Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma3 pages

$~25 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 477/2025 HARDEEP SINGH & ORS.

.....Petitioners Through:

Mr. Shashi Kant Maurya and Mrs.

Komal, Advocates alongwith petitioners in person versus STATE(NCT OF DELHI) & ANR.

.....Respondent Through:

Mr. Rajkumar, APP for the State along with main IO SI Rajender Anti Narcotics Squed and SI Mukesh Kumar PS Tilak Nagar

CORAM:

HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA

O R D E R

% 03.07.2025 CRL.M.A. 18632/2025 (impleadment) 1.

By way of the instant application, the applicant prays to implead Ms. Vinipreet Kaur and Ms. Sanpreet Kaur as petitioners in the present petition since they were chargesheeted in the present case. 2.

In view of the above, the application stands allowed and is accordingly disposed of.

3.

The amended memo of parties is on record.

CRL.M.C. 477/2025 4.

By way of the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR bearing no. 417/2022, registered at Police Station Tilak Nagar, Delhi for the The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

commission of offence punishable under Sections 498A/406/34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereafter 'IPC').

5.

The petitioners and respondent no. 2 have appeared before this Court in person. They have been identified by their counsels and concerned Investigating Officer (IO) from Police Station Tilak Nagar, Delhi. 6.

Briefly stated, facts of the present case are that the marriage between petitioner no. 1 and respondent no. 2 was solemnised on 18.01.2019 according to Hindu rites and customs. It is stated that no child was born out of their wedlock. It is stated that due to temperamental differences, both the parties started residing separately since 04.03.2020. On the complaint of respondent no. 2, the present FIR was registered against the petitioners. Respondent no. 2 had also filed a petition under Section 125 of CR.P.C. against the petitioner no.1 before the Family Court, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi. Thereafter, with the intervention of the relatives and family members, both the parties have amicably settled their disputes vide Settlement Deed dated 06.03.2024, entered between them before the Delhi Government Mediation & Conciliation Centre.

7.

On the last date of hearing, the complainant was present before the Court and had given her statement that she has no objection, if the FIR is quashed.

8.

In view of the above fact that the parties have amicably resolved their differences of their own free will, without any coercion and no useful purpose will be served by continuing the proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between them. It would thus be in interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. There is no legal impediment in quashing the FIR in question. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

9.

Accordingly, FIR bearing no. 417/2022, registered at Police Station Tilak Nagar, Delhi for the commission of offence punishable under Sections 498A/406/34 of IPC and all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.

10.

In view of the above, the present petition stands disposed of. 11.

The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. DR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J JULY 03, 2025/ns Click here to check corrigendum, if any The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.