Muslim v. State

66# $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 62/2018 MUSLIM ..... Petitioner Represented by:

Mr. Kunal Malhotra, Advocate.

versus STATE ..... Respondent Represented by:

Mr. R.S. Kundu, Additional Standing Counsel for State with ASI Tulli Ram, PS Badarpur.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA

O R D E R

% 18.04.2018 Crl.M.A. No. 7085/2018 (modification of order dated 21st March, 2018) 1.

By this application the petitioner seeks modification of the order dated 21st March, 2018 to the extent imposing the condition of furnishing a personal bond and the surety bond of ₹25,000/- by the petitioner for grant of parole.

2.

Issue notice.

3.

Learned Additional Standing Counsel accepts notice on behalf of the State.

4.

As per the status report placed on record, petitioner's family comprises of his two sons, who are residing with the family members at H. No. 126, Dharampal Colony, Tajpur Village, Badarpur, New Delhi for the last 35 years.

W.P.(CRL) 62/2018

5.

Petitioner was on bail during the course of trial and his sentence had been suspended pending hearing of the appeal. 6.

Considering the fact that the petitioner has roots in the society, order dated 21st March, 2018 is modified. Petitioner be now released on parole for a period of four weeks from the date of his release on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of ₹10,000/- with one surety of the like amount subject to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court/CMM concerned. 7.

Application is disposed of.

8.

Copy of the order be communicated to the petitioner through Superintendent, Tihar Jail.

MUKTA GUPTA, J.

APRIL 18, 2018 'vn'

W.P.(CRL) 62/2018