← Library
High Court of DelhiCRL.REV.P.(NI)/18/2025

Rohit Jain v. Vatsal Mittal

2025-01-27Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Jasmeet Singh3 pages

$~58 to 62 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.REV.P.(NI) 18/2025, CRL.M.A.

2413/2025, CRL.M.A.

2414/2025, CRL.M.(BAIL) 172/2025 + CRL.REV.P.(NI) 19/2025, CRL.M.A.

2415/2025, CRL.M.A.

2416/2025, CRL.M.(BAIL) 173/2025 + CRL.REV.P.(NI) 20/2025, CRL.M.A.

2417/2025, CRL.M.A.

2418/2025, CRL.M.(BAIL) 174/2025 + CRL.REV.P.(NI) 21/2025, CRL.M.A.

2419/2025, CRL.M.A.

2420/2025, CRL.M.(BAIL) 175/2025 + CRL.REV.P.(NI) 22/2025, CRL.M.A.

2421/2025, CRL.M.A.

2422/2025, CRL.M.(BAIL) 176/2025 ROHIT JAIN

Versus

VATSAL MITTAL MEMO OF APPEARANCE Mr Amit Gupta, Mr Kamal Garg, Mr Prateek Mehta, Mr Kshitij Vaibhav, Advocates for Petitioner.

Petitioner-in-person.

Respondent-in-person.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH

O R D E R

% 27.01.2025 1.

These are petitions seeking setting aside of the judgments dated 13.01.2025 passed by Appellate Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi in Appeal Nos. 56/2024, 57/2024, 58/2024, 59/2024, 60/2024 titled „Rohit Jain v. Vatsal Mittal‟ whereby the learned The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

Sessions Court upheld the judgments dated 20.01.2024 and orders on sentence dated 07.03.2024 passed by learned MM (MCD), Karkardooma Court, Delhi in Complaint Case Nos. 1258/2017, 697/2017, 743/2017, 671/2017 and 748/2017.

2.

The appellant has been convicted for the offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and sentenced to various periods of imprisonment as well as fine. 3.

During the pendency of the proceedings, the parties have arrived at a settlement wherein the petitioner has paid a sum of Rs. 18 lakhs by way of a demand draft bearing No. 001485 dated 16.01.2025 drawn on AU Small Finance Bank Limited in favour of the respondent towards full and final settlement of all the five complaints.

4.

The respondent - Mr Vatsal Mittal is present in Court today and has accepted the amount and states that he has no objection if the petitions are allowed and the orders of conviction is set aside. 5.

Since the amounts covered in the complaints have been settled, entire amount has been paid and the complainant/respondent herein has no objection to the petitions being allowed, I am inclined to allow these petitions. Consequently, the judgments dated 20.01.2024 and orders on sentence dated 07.03.2024 passed by learned MM (MCD), Karkardooma Court, Delhi in Complaint Case Nos. 1258/2017, 697/2017, 743/2017, 671/2017 and 748/2017 which were upheld by the judgments dated 13.01.2025 passed by Appellate Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi in Appeal Nos. 56/2024, 57/2024, 58/2024, 59/2024, 60/2024 are set aside and the proceedings are closed. 6.

The petitions are disposed of accordingly. All the pending The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

applications are also disposed of.

JASMEET SINGH, J JANUARY 27, 2025/sr Click here to check corrigendum, if any The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.