Milap Chand And ORS. v. Union Of India And ORS.

$~24 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 179/2018 MILAP CHAND AND ORS.

..... Petitioners Through:

Ms.Saahila Lamba, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

..... Respondents Through:

Mr.J.K.Singh, St.Counsel for Railways with Mr.Ranjeet Kumar & Ms.Madhulika Agarwal, Advocates

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI

O R D E R

% 25.05.2018 CM No.22477/2018 (by the petitioners under Section 151 CPC) 1.

This application has been filed by the petitioners in a petition that was disposed of on 20.03.2018, on directing the respondents to consider their representations and pass a speaking order under written intimation to them, through counsel, within six weeks from the date of the passing of the order. 2.

We are prima facie of the opinion that the present application is not maintainable in a disposed of petition. However, since learned counsel for the respondents has appeared on advance notice and states that he may be permitted to obtain instructions from the Department regarding the fate of the representations submitted by the petitioners, list on 10.07.2018, to await instructions.

W.P.(C) 179/2018

3.

If a speaking order has not been passed by the respondents on the representations of the petitioners, till date, necessary orders shall be passed well before the next date of hearing, under written intimation to the petitioners. A copy of the order passed shall be placed on record. HIMA KOHLI, J.

PRATIBHA RANI, J.

MAY 25, 2018 'hkaur'

W.P.(C) 179/2018