Pinnacle Engineers v. Commissioner, Trade & Taxes & ANR.

$-46, 76

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(C) 1953/2017 RPELECTRICALS Through: Mr. Nitin Gupta, Adv.

versus COMMISSIONER, TRADE & TAXES & ANR Respondent Through: Mr. N.S. Arora, Adv.

+ W.P.(C) 80/2017 PINNACLE ENGINEERS petitioner Through: Mr. Nitin Gupta, Adv.

versus COMMISSIONER, TRADE & TAXES & ANR Respondent Through: Mr. Rahul Sharma and Mr. C.K. Bhatt, Advs.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI

ORDER

28.03.2017 It is stated by the DVAT department that the C-form and other statutory forms were not received or received recently in these matters.

In the circumstances, the petitioners shall furnish applications to the DVAT department and the DVAT department shall ensure that the amounts together with interest for the undisputed period and to the extent it is not disputed as far as it does not relate to such statutory forms, is disbursed to the petitioners' accounts, within a By:AMULYA

week. With respect to the amounts relatable to the statutory forms and the interest, the department shall ensure that such amounts are kept m an interest bearing security and the payment is made subject to the final outcome of the appeals preferred before the Supreme Court. The writ petitions are disposed off.

S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J NAJMI WAZIRI, J MARCH 28,2017/acm