Puschpender v. State

$~37 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(CRL) 2793/2019 PUSCHPENDER ..... Petitioner Through:

Ms Meenal Duggal, Advocate.

versus STATE ..... Respondent Through:

Ms Nandita Rao, ASC (CRL.) for GNCTD.

SI Sandeep Kumar, PS Narela.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU

O R D E R

% 27.09.2019 1.

The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, seeking parole for a further period of twenty-eight days.

2.

The petitioner was convicted under Sections 302/304B/498A/34 of the IPC and sentenced to serve rigorous imprisonment for life and a fine of ₹45,000/-. It is seen that the petitioner has been on furlough for a period of ten weeks during the last eleven months.

3.

Ms Rao, learned ASC, states that the petitioner has applied for parole and his application would be decided within a period of one week from today.

4.

In view of the above, no further orders are required to be passed in this petition.

5.

The petition is dismissed.

VIBHU BAKHRU, J SEPTEMBER 27, 2019/RK