← Library
High Court of DelhiCRL.M.C./60/2017

Inderjeet Singh Saini & ORS. v. Govt. Of NCT Of Delhi & ANR.

2017-01-09Hon'Ble Mr. Justice I.S.Mehta2 pages

$~43 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CRL.M.C. 60/2017 INDERJEET SINGH SAINI & ORS.

..... Petitioners Through:

Mr.Nitin Panwar, Adv.

versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.

..... Respondents Through:

Ms.Kusum Dhalla, APP for State ASI Veerpal Singh, PS-Tilak Nagar Mr.Sunil Kumar, Adv. for R-2.

Complainant and injured in person.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE I.S.MEHTA

O R D E R

% 09.01.2017 This is a petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of FIR No. 1624/2015, under Sections 308/34 IPC, registered at Police Station-Tilak Nagar, New Delhi and all proceedings emanating therefrom. Counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners and the complainant are residents of same locality and due to misunderstanding between the parties, the complainant lodged FIR No. 1624/2015, under Sections 308/34 IPC at Police Station-Tilak Nagar, New Delhi. He has further submitted that after registration of the FIR qua the petitioners, the relatives and the friends intervened and the matter has been settled between the parties vide settlement deed dated 19th December, 2016. Learned counsel for the petitioners further submits that all disputes have been amicably settled between the parties and nothing remains to be adjudicated upon

further and submits that the FIR in question is coming as hurdle in the way of the present petitioners. He further submits that the petitioners and the respondent No.2 want to lead peaceful life in near future and since all disputes have been settled between them, the FIR in question and all proceedings arising therefrom may be quashed. The respondent No.2/injured Chandan Singh and the complainant Jugender Singh are present in Court today and have been identified by the Investigating Officer, ASI Veerpal Singh, P.S.Tilak Nagar, New Delhi. The complainant and the injured also admit that the matter has been amicably settled with the petitioners vide settlement/compromise deed dated 19th December, 2016 and have no claim or grievance left against the petitioners. They further submit that the settlement/compromise dated 19th December, 2016 has taken place voluntarily, without any force, pressure or coercion. They further submit that they have no objection if the FIR in question is quashed.

Looking into the above facts and circumstances, since the parties are stated to be residents of same locality and the matter has been amicably settled between them and nothing remains to be adjudicated further, to meet the ends of justice, I deem it appropriate to quash the FIR No. 1624/2015, under Sections 308/34 IPC, registered at Police Station-Tilak Nagar, New Delhi, and all proceedings emanating therefrom. The present petition is disposed of accordingly. Copy of the order be given dasti .

I.S.MEHTA, J JANUARY 09, 2017/radhika