← Library
High Court of DelhiW.P.(C)/1376/2026

Madan Singh v. Union Of India & ORS.

2026-02-02Hon'Ble Mr. Justice V. Kameswar Rao,Hon'Ble Ms. Justice Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora2 pages

$~51 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1376/2026 MADAN SINGH .....Petitioner Through:

Mr. Ajay Kumar Bhargava, Mr.

Satyaarth Sinha, Ms. Shradha Mewati and Mr. Ajinkya Dhalwade, Advs.

versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

.....Respondents Through:

Mr. Syed Abdul Haseeb, CGSC with Ms. Nasreen Khatoon, GP, UOI HC Jitendra Kumar Mishra, B.S.F. for UOI

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA

O R D E R

% 02.02.2026 1.

This petition has been filed with the following prayers: "1. Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, directing the DG BSF to release disability pension consisting of service element and disability in favour of the Petitioner Under CCS(EOP) Rules, rule 4(2)(b) and arrears with@12% from the date of invalidation i.e., 22.04.2024, IN THE LIGHT OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 06.11.2025, KALU RAM VS. UNION OF INDIA & ORS., W.P.(C) 4350/2025;

2. Pass any other order in the interest of Justice." 2.

Our attention has been drawn to an order dated 21.01.2026 in Ravi Sangwan v. Union of India & Ors. in W.P. (C) 5770/2025. The learned counsel contend that on identical facts, the relief has been granted by the respondents in favour of the petitioner therein, Mr. Ravi Sangwan. 3.

Mr. Bhargava, learned counsel for the petitioner states that The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/02/2026 at 12:58:59

appropriate shall be that the respondents should treat this petition as a representation and decide the same keeping in view the judgment in the case of Kalu Ram vs. Union of India & Ors. W. P. (C) 4350/2025 as followed in Ravi Sangwan v. Union of India & Ors. W.P. (C) 5770/2025 by this Bench, decided on 21.01.2026.

4.

If that be so, we direct the respondents to consider this petition as a representation and decide the same within 12 weeks as an outer limit. 5.

The petitioner if still aggrieved, shall be at liberty to approach this Court in accordance with law.

6.

The petition is disposed of.

V. KAMESWAR RAO, J MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J FEBRUARY 02, 2026/msh The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/02/2026 at 12:58:59