Sonali Yadav v. The State Govt Of NCT Of Delhi And ANR.
$~73 *
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ CRL.M.C. 844/2026 SONALI YADAV .....Petitioner Through:
Mr.
Anubhav Dubey with Mr.
Schidanand Choudhary, Advocates Petitioner in-person versus THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR.
.....Respondents Through:
Mr. Nawal Kishore Jha, APP for the State.
R2 in-person.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI
O R D E R
% 02.02.2026 CRL.M.A. 3337/2026 Exemption granted, subject to just exceptions. The application stands disposed-of.
CRL.M.C. 844/2026 By way of the present petition filed under section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, the petitioner seeks quashing of case FIR No. 54/2021 dated 02.03.2021 registered under sections 186/353/323/427 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 ('IPC') at P.S.: I.P. Estate, Central Delhi.
2.
The petition is premised on a Memorandum of Understanding ('MoU') dated 12.01.2026, whereby the petitioner and respondent No. 2 have resolved the matter amicably.
3.
The petition is also supported by affidavits of the petitioner and of respondent No. 2, alongwith proof of their IDs. CRL.M.C. 844/2026 The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/02/2026 at 12:24:21
4.
The contesting parties are present in court. Their credentials have been verified and they have also been identified by their respective counsel.
5.
The court has interacted with respondent No.2, as well as with the petitioner, who have confirmed that they have now resolved the matter and MoU dated 12.01.2026 has been signed by them closing all issues amicably. Parties now wish to live in peace and harmony going forward.
6.
Mr. Nawal Kishore Jha, learned APP confirms that the State has no objection to the subject FIR being quashed.
7.
In the circumstances, in line with the law laid down by the Supreme Court in Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab & Anr. reported as (2012) 10 SCC 303 as also in Narinder Singh & Ors. vs. State of Punjab & Anr. reported as (2014) 6 SCC 466, this court sees no reason why the subject FIR and all proceedings emanating therefrom should not be quashed. This court is of the view that in light of the settlement between the contesting parties, continuing with the subject FIR and all subsequent proceedings would be an exercise in futility and would not be conducive to peace and harmony between the parties. 8.
Accordingly, case FIR No. 54/2021 dated 02.03.2021 registered under sections 186/353/323/427 IPC at P.S.: I.P. Estate, Central Delhi is quashed. All proceedings arising therefrom also stand closed. 9.
Petition stands disposed-of.
10.
Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed-of. ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, J FEBRUARY 2, 2026/ds CRL.M.C. 844/2026 The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/02/2026 at 12:24:21