Jai Karan Agarwal v. Vinod Patidar

$~40 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + C.R.P. 40/2024 JAI KARAN AGARWAL ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. Anukrit Gupta and Mr.

Arbaaz Hussain, Advs.

versus VINOD PATIDAR ..... Respondent Through:

None.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DHARMESH SHARMA

O R D E R

% 01.02.2024 CM APPL. 6022/2024 (Ex.) 1.

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2.

The application stands disposed of.

C.R.P. 40/2024 and CM APPL. 6021/2024 (Stay) 3.

The petitioner, who is the defendant in the suit under Order XXXVII CPC before the learned Trial Court, is assailing the impugned order dated 05.01.2024, whereby, although the application for leave to defend under Order XXXVII Rule 3(5) CPC has been allowed, the petitioner has been called upon to make a deposit of Rs. 2 lakhs by way of Fixed Deposit in the court within fifteen days. 4.

Since the direction is only for investment in a fixed deposit, it does not prejudice the petitioner in any manner, There is no merit in the civil revision petition. The same is dismissed without prejudice. The pending application is also disposed of.

DHARMESH SHARMA, J.

FEBRUARY 1, 2024/sp The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 14:04:23