Alam v. State

$~66.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 277/2017 ALAM ..... Petitioner Through:

Mr. K. Singhal, Advocate versus STATE ..... Respondent Through:

Mr. Sanjay Lao, ASC with SI Satish Bhati, PS Kalkaji

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI

O R D E R

% 27.01.2017 Issue notice. Notice is accepted on behalf of the State. The status report tendered in court is taken on record. The petitioner is seeking parole so as to prefer a Special Leave Petition against the judgment of this court dated 03.06.2016 dismissing his appeal. The petitioner is serving a sentence of 7 years rigorous imprisonment with fine in case FIR 221/2011 under Section 376 IPC registered at PS Kalkaji. The petitioner has undergone 5 years 5 months and 1 day incarceration as on 20.12.2016. His jail conduct has been found to satisfactory. The address of the petitioner has been got verified. Accordingly, the petition is allowed.

In these circumstances, the petitioner is directed to be released on parole for a period of three weeks subject to: i) his furnishing personal bond with one surety in the sum of Rs.10,000/- to the satisfaction of the Jail Superintendent; ii) he shall provide his mobile phone number to the Jail Superintendent at the time of his release, which shall be kept in working condition at all times. The same shall not be changed without prior intimation to the Jail Superintendent;

iii) he shall report at the local police station to mark his attendance on every Monday at 11:00 a.m. during the period of parole; iv) he shall duly surrender at the end of the period of parole; v) he shall not establish any contact with the victim or her family members, and shall also not indulge in any criminal activity while on parole;

vi) the proof of filing of Special Leave Petition be provided to the Jail Superintendant.

VIPIN SANGHI, J JANUARY 27, 2017 sr