Mukesh Kumar v. Union Of India & ORS

35# $~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 61/2017 MUKESH KUMAR ..... Petitioner Represented by:

Petitioner in person.

versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Represented by:

Ms. Bharathi Raju, CGSC for respondent Nos. 1 to 3.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA

O R D E R

% 13.02.2017 Crl. M.A. No. 2377/2017 (amendment of memo of parties) By this application the petitioner, who appears in person, had sought amendment of the memo of parties. Petitioner states that he does not press the present petition and would pursue the remedy on the administrative side and thus he be permitted to withdraw the writ petition itself. Consequently, he says that his application being Crl. M.A. No. 2377/2017 be dismissed as infructuous.

Crl. M.A. No. 2377/2017 is dismissed as infructuous. W.P.(CRL) 61/2017 Writ petition is permitted to be withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to take remedies as available to him in law. Date of 27th March, 2017 is cancelled.

MUKTA GUPTA, J.

FEBRUARY 13, 2017/'vn'