Mantek Singh Randhawa v. State & Arn.

// $~20&21 * IN T + HE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(CRL) 60/2017 MANTEK SINGH RANDHAWA .... Petitioner Represented by: Mr.Saoyib Qureshi with Mr.Sandeep Bajaj and Ms.Nikita Chitale, Advocates versus STATE & ANR.

... Respondents Ms.Pumima Malik, proxy counsel for Mr.Avi Singh, ASC for the State with SI Avinash Kumar, PS C.R.Park Mr.Vipin Sanduja with Mr.Nitin Devgun and Mr.Parth Sharma, Advocates for respondent No.2 Represented by:

< + W.P.(CRL) 63/2017 KULVINDER KAUR.

... Petitioner .

Mr.Saoyib Qureshi with Mr.Sandeep Bajaj and Ms.Nikita Chitale, Advocates Represented by:

versus STATE & ANR.

... Respondents Ms.Pumima Malik, proxy counsel for Mr.Avi Singh, ASC for the State with SI Avinash Kumar, PS C.R.Park Mr.Vipin Sanduja with Mr.Nitin Devgun and Mr.Parth Sharma, Advocates for respondent No.2 Represented by:

W.P.(CRL) Nos. 60/2017 & 63/2017 By:AMULYA

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA

ORDER

30.07.2018 Despite undertaking by learned counsel for the petitioners, petitioners are not present in Court.

Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to approach this Court in case the petitioners anive in India. Leave and liberty granted.

Petitions are dismissed as withdrawn.

JULY 30,2018 MUKTA GUPTA, J.

'rk'

4!

W.P.(CRL) Nos.60/2017 & 63/2017