Shahnawaj @ Shahnawaz v. The State Govt. Of NCT Of Delhi And ORS.

$~89 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.M.C. 628/2025 SHAHNAWAJ @ SHAHNAWAZ .....Petitioners Through:

Mr. Abdul Kadir with Mr. Mohd Tasleem, Mr. Nadeem Ahmad, Mr.

Salman, Mr. Shahrukh, Mr. Vikash, Advocates along with petitioners in person.

versus THE STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS.

.....Respondents Through:

Mr. Naresh Kumar Chahar, APP for State along with SI Shiv Dayal Kumar.

Mr. Shuaib Alam, Advocate for R-2 to R-4 along with R-2 to R-4 are in person.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA

O R D E R

% 11.03.2025 1.

By way of present petition, the petitioner is seeking quashing of the FIR bearing no. 504/2021 dated 08.10.2021, registered at Police Station, Dayalpur, Delhi, for the offences punishable under Sections 323/3234/341/506/34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereafter 'IPC') and proceeding pending before the learned ACJM (North East), Karkardooma Courts, Delhi.

2.

Petitioner is present before this Court and has been identified by his The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

counsel Mr. Abdul Qadir and Investigating Officer (IO) concerned, Police Station, Dayalpur, Delhi.

3.

Brief facts of the case are that on 07.10.2021 a quarrel took place between the petitioners and respondents no. 2 to 4 during which injuries were sustained upon respondents no. 2 to 4 thereafter a complaint was made by respondents no. 2 to 4 which resulted in the aforementioned FIR bearing No. 504/2021 against the petitioners.

4.

The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that both the parties have amicably settled their dispute vide Settlement Agreement dated 24.08.2024. It is further stated that for compoundable offences as per the statements recorded before the learned Joint Registrar, the complainants have been compensated for non-compoundable offences. 5.

On a query made by this Court, respondents no. 2 to 4 who have been identified by the IO, have categorically stated that they have agreed to compromise out of their own free will and without any pressure, coercion or threat. Further, it is also stated by respondents no.2 to 4 that since they are neighbours the entire dispute has been amicably settled/compromised the parties and therefore, respondents no. 2 to 4 have no objection if the present FIR may be quashed.

6.

In view of the above, the parties have amicably resolved their differences of their own free will, and without any coercion and no useful purpose will be fulfilled by continuing the present proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between them. It would, thus, be in interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. There is no legal impediment in quashing the FIR in question.

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

7.

Accordingly, FIR bearing No. 504/2021, registered at Police Station Dayalpur, Delhi, for the offences punishable under Sections 323/3234/341/506/34 of IPC and all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom is quashed.

8.

In view of the above, the present petition stands disposed of. 9.

The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J MARCH 11, 2025/vc Click here to check corrigendum, if any The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.