Ram @ Ram Dass v. State Of NCT Delhi & ANR.

$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 384/2024 RAM @ RAM DASS .....Petitioner Through:

Mr. Neeraj Kumar, Advocate.

versus STATE OF NCT DELHI & ANR.

.....RespondentS Through:

Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari, ASC with Ms.

Charu Sharma, Mr. Arjit Sharma, Mr.

Vaibhav Vats, Mr. Nikunj Bindal, Advocates for State.

SI Sunder Singh, PS: Nangloi.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL

O R D E R

% 17.09.2024 1.

Pursuant to previous directions of this Court, counsel for petitioner had an interaction with the petitioner in custody. An interaction sheet has been provided where it has been stated that the convict has informed that for a loan of Rs. 2,50,000/- taken in cash from one Rajesh, he had given possession of the first floor of the property at Nihal Vihar, Nangloi, New Delhi without any rent to give time to convict to pay the said loan. 2.

Parole has been sought for getting release of the house which had been kept as security/mortgage and for arranging funds for livelihood of his minor child. It has been previously verified by State that petitioner's child aged 17 years of age was residing alone at the address at Nihal Vihar. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

3.

Petitioner's son is also present in Court and states that he has to get admission in school for 12th standard and requires his guardian for this purpose. He states that his mother passed away in 2007 and his grandparents have also passed away.

4.

As per the nominal roll, petitioner has been in custody in FIR no. 163/2008 registered under Section 302 IPC for a period of 16 years. 5.

Further, remission has been earned for about 3 years 9 months as on 13th January, 2024.

6.

Petitioner has previously been granted furlough during 2015-2021 on various dates; only on one occasion in 2021, the petitioner did not surrender on time and was re-arrested in 2021, during the covid pandemic. 7.

In these circumstances, parole is granted for four weeks with liberty to file for subsequent release if so necessitated. 8.

In view of the above, this Court sees no impediment in granting parole to the petitioner. The petitioner is enlarged on parole for a period of 4 weeks from the date of release subject to furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Jail Superintendent subject to the following conditions: - i.

The petitioner shall provide the SHO, PS Nangloi, Delhi with mobile telephone number which shall be kept in working condition at all times and shall not switch off or change the mobile number without prior intimation to the SHO concerned. ii.

The petitioner shall not leave the National Capital Territory of Delhi during the period of parole, without the prior permission of The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.

this Court.

iii.

The petitioner shall not indulge in any criminal activity and shall not communicate with or come in contact with the complainant/victim or any member of the complainant/victim's family or tamper with the evidence of the case. iv. The petitioner is directed to surrender before the jail authorities at the expiry of the period of parole.

9.

Accordingly, the petition is disposed of.

10.

Copy of the order be sent to the Jail Superintendent for information and necessary compliance.

11.

'dasti'

12.

Order be uploaded on the website of this Court. ANISH DAYAL, J SEPTEMBER 17, 2024/RK/kp Click here to check corrigendum, if any The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above.