Neha v. Union Of India And ORS

$~38 to 40 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(C) 16226/2023 HARSH OJHA AND OTHERS .....Petitioners Through:

Mr. Prakhar Bhatnagar and Mr Arkam Pasha, Advs.

versus UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS .....Respondents Through:

Ms. Hanu Bhaskar, CGSC for UOI Ms Radhika Bishwajit Dubey, Adv (CGSC) alongwith Ms Gurleen Kaur Waraich, Adv;

Ms Khushi, Adv and Mr Saksham Sharma, Adv.

+ W.P.(C) 4560/2024 RAJINDER SINGH AND ORS.

.....Petitioners Through:

Mr. Prakhar Bhatnagar and Mr Arkam Pasha, Advs.

versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

.....Respondents Through:

Ms. Hanu Bhaskar, CGSC for UOI Ms Radhika Bishwajit Dubey, Adv (CGSC) alongwith Ms Gurleen Kaur Waraich, Adv;

Ms Khushi, Adv and Mr Saksham Sharma, Adv.

+ W.P.(C) 1227/2025 & CM APPL. 6024/2025, CM APPL. 28404/2025 NEHA .....Petitioner Through:

Mr. Prakhar Bhatnagar and Mr Arkam Pasha, Advs.

versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS .....Respondents Through:

Ms Radhika Bishwajit Dubey, Adv (CGSC) alongwith Ms Gurleen Kaur Waraich, Adv; Ms Khushi, Adv and Mr Saksham Sharma, Adv

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLA ORDER (ORAL) % 12.08.2025 C. HARI SHANKAR, J.

1.

Mr. Bhatnagar, learned Counsel for the petitioner, submits that these writ petitions are amenable to the jurisdiction of the Central Administrative Tribunal in terms of Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunal Act 1985.

2.

Accordingly, we transfer these writ petitions to the Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench to be treated as original applications.

3.

We direct the Registry of this Court to transmit the record to the Tribunal. The Tribunal would renumber these writ petitions as original applications and proceed with the matter accordingly. 4.

In order to expedite matters, we direct the parties to be present

before the Tribunal on 4 September 2025.

5.

The writ petitions are accordingly disposed of in the above terms.

C. HARI SHANKAR, J.

OM PRAKASH SHUKLA, J.

AUGUST 12, 2025 dsn