Vinit Bahri & ANR. v. Municipal Corporation Of Delhi & ANR.
$~70 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1256/2025 VINIT BAHRI & ANR.
.....Petitioners Through:
Mr. Mukti Bodh, Advocate.
versus MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ANR......Respondents Through:
Mr. Tushar Sannu, Advocate for Respondent No.1/MCD.
Ms. Mala Diwadi, Advocate with Ms. Neha Chaturvedi, AR, for Respondent No.2.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH
O R D E R
% 04.02.2025 C.M. APPL. 6198/2025 1.
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
2.
Application stands disposed of.
W.P.(C) 1256/2025 3.
This writ petition is preferred on behalf of Petitioners under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for a direction to Respondents to execute and register a Sub-Lease Deed/Conveyance Deed/Deed of Title in favour of Petitioners.
4.
It is the case of Petitioners, as averred in the writ petition and as articulated by learned counsel consistently, that there are no pending disputes inter se between Petitioners and Respondent No.2. W.P.(C) 1256/2025 The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/02/2025 at 14:50:59
5.
This position is confirmed and acknowledged by Ms. Neha Chaturvedi, Authorised Representative of Respondent No.2, who is present in Court. She further submits that Respondent No.2 is only a confirming party under the Sub-Lease Deed and the draft of the Sub-Lease Deed has been forwarded to the MCD, which the MCD has to approve and start the process of registration.
6.
Mr. Tushar Sannu submits that Petitioners have to first apply to Respondent No.2 for confirmation and execution of the Sub-Lease Deed and after this process is complete, MCD will process the case, in accordance with law and provisions of the Concessionaire Agreement. 7.
Petitioners' counsel, on instructions, submits that he will make appropriate application to Respondent No.2 within four weeks from today. On receipt of confirmation, further process will be initiated by MCD, as expeditiously as possible.
8.
Accordingly, writ petition is disposed of with the aforesaid directions. 9.
Needless to state that if the Petitioners are still aggrieved, it will be open to the Petitioners to seek revival of this writ petition. JYOTI SINGH, J FEBRUARY 4, 2025 B.S. Rohella W.P.(C) 1256/2025 The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/02/2025 at 14:50:59