Ramesh Chand & ORS. v. Anil Goswami & ORS.

$~1,2&35 *

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CONT.CAS(C) 857/2014 + CONT.CAS(C) 858/2014 + CONT.CAS(C) 9/2015 AMAR SINGH & ANR.

Petitioners In CONT.CAS(C) 857/2014 NATHMAL VERMA & ANR.

Petitioners In CONT.CAS(C) 858/2014 RAMESH CHAND & ORS.

Petitioners In CONT.CAS(C) 9/2015 Represented by: Mr. Ankur Chibber and Ms. Aakriti Jain, Advs.

versus ANIL GOSWAMI & ORS Respondents Represented by: Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, CGSC with Ms. Apurva Verma, Adv. for R1 in Cont.Cas (C) 857/2014 with Mr. S.S. Sejwal, Law Officer, CRPF.

Mr. Ruchir Mishra, Mr. Sajiv Kr. Saxena and Mr. Mukesh Kr. Tiwari, Advs. in Cont. Cas (C) 858/2014.

Mr. Rajesh Sharma, Adv. for R1 to R3 in Cont. Cas (C) 9/2015.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KAIT

ORDER

% 26.02.2015 1.

Pursuant to orders dated 15,07.2014and 29.05.2014 passed in W.P.(C)4282/2014and W.P.(C)3661/2014respectivelyand order dated By:AMULYA

02.12.2014 passed by this Court in the above petitions and order dated 12.09.2014 passed in 6055/2014, respondents have filed compHance report whereby stated that the aforesaid orders have been complied with.

2.

Ld. Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents further seeks 8 weeks time to grant the benefits to the petitioners as per MHA/UO dated 16.02.2015 on delayed payment.

3.

In view of the averments made in the reply filed by the respondents, they are directed grant the benefits to the petitioners within 8 weeks from today.

Failing which, respondents shall pay Rs.25,000/- per month to each of the petitioners. 4.

If the petitioners are still aggrieved with the decision of the respondents, liberty is granted to them to revive the present petitions. 5.

Accordingly, the petitions are disposed of.

SURESHKAIT,J FEBRUARY 26,2015 Jg